More arguments for
A summary of rules, not a profit forecast — don’t buy just because of a green verdict.
🟡 Valuation- ▲ Forward P/E 11.8 is below the current one — earnings growth expected
🟢 Quality- ▲ ROE 20% — high return on equity
- ▼ Net margin fell: 33.9% → 29.9%
- ▲ Debt / equity 0.35 — moderate debt
- ▲ Free cash flow positive every year
🟡 Growth- ▲ Revenue grows 10.7% per year (3 y)
- ▼ Analysts cut the earnings forecast by -9.2% in 90 days
🔴 Trend- ▼ Over 6 mo weaker than its sector (XLC) by 5%
- ▼ Price below SMA200 — long-term downtrend
- ▼ SMA50 below SMA200 — trend down
- ▼ Over a year -41% vs S&P 500 +11% — weaker than the market
🔴 Risk · context, does not vote- ▲ Risk/reward 1:2.2 — the target is farther than the stop
- ▼ Volatility 33% per year — much higher than the market (13%)
- ▼ Max drawdown in the period -60% — deep
🟢 Sentiment- ▲ Consensus of 4 analysts — buy
- ▲ Mean analyst target +81% from the current price
🔴 Market · context, does not vote- ▲ S&P 500 above SMA200 — the market is in an uptrend
- ▼ Sector (XLC) below SMA200 — in a downtrend
- ▼ Sector (XLC) over 3 mo is weaker than the market by 8%
The PWA verdict uses less data than the full version: without the history of multiples and peers, F-score, Altman, interest coverage, dividend streak and expected earnings move.