More arguments for
A summary of rules, not a profit forecast — don’t buy just because of a green verdict.
🟡 Valuation- ▲ Forward P/E 18.4 is below the current one — earnings growth expected
🟢 Quality- ▲ ROE 38% — high return on equity
- ▲ Net margin rose: 18.9% → 20.3%
- ▲ Debt / equity 0.98 — moderate debt
- ▲ Free cash flow positive every year
🟡 Growth- ▼ Revenue falls -1.3% per year (3 y)
- ▲ Analysts raised the earnings forecast by +1.1% in 90 days
🟢 Trend- ▼ Over 6 mo weaker than its sector (XLV) by 6%
- ▲ Price above SMA200 — long-term uptrend
- ▲ SMA50 above SMA200 — trend up
- ▲ Over a year +51% vs S&P 500 +11% — stronger than the market
🔴 Risk · context, does not vote- ▲ Risk/reward 1:2.7 — the target is farther than the stop
- ▼ Volatility 29% per year — much higher than the market (13%)
- ▼ Max drawdown in the period -45% — deep
🟡 Sentiment- ▲ Consensus of 7 analysts — buy
🟢 Market · context, does not vote- ▲ S&P 500 above SMA200 — the market is in an uptrend
- ▲ Sector (XLV) above SMA200 — in an uptrend
- ▲ Sector (XLV) over 3 mo is stronger than the market by 11%
The PWA verdict uses less data than the full version: without the history of multiples and peers, F-score, Altman, interest coverage, dividend streak and expected earnings move.