PDD · Verdict
More arguments for
A summary of rules, not a profit forecast — don’t buy just because of a green verdict.
🟡 Valuation- ▲ Forward P/E 6.4 is below the current one — earnings growth expected
🟢 Quality- ▲ ROE 23% — high return on equity
- ▼ Net margin fell: 24.2% → 22.7%
- ▲ Debt / equity 0.01 — moderate debt
- ▲ Free cash flow positive every year
🟢 Growth- ▲ Revenue grows 49.0% per year (3 y)
- ▲ Earnings per share grows 45.2% per year (3 y)
🔴 Trend- ▼ Over 6 mo weaker than its sector (XLY) by 19%
- ▼ Price below SMA200 — long-term downtrend
- ▼ SMA50 below SMA200 — trend down
- ▼ Over a year -42% vs S&P 500 +11% — weaker than the market
🔴 Risk · context, does not vote- ▼ Risk/reward 1:0.9 — the target is closer than the stop
- ▼ Volatility 33% per year — much higher than the market (13%)
- ▼ Max drawdown in the period -73% — deep
🟢 Sentiment- ▲ Consensus of 33 analysts — buy
- ▲ Mean analyst target +47% from the current price
- ▲ Insiders buying over 6 mo
🟡 Market · context, does not vote- ▲ S&P 500 above SMA200 — the market is in an uptrend
- ▼ Sector (XLY) below SMA200 — in a downtrend
The PWA verdict uses less data than the full version: without the history of multiples and peers, F-score, Altman, interest coverage, dividend streak and expected earnings move.