Mixed arguments
A summary of rules, not a profit forecast — don’t buy just because of a green verdict.
🟢 Quality- ▼ Debt up 100% in 3 y
- ▲ Share count down 7% in 3 y — buybacks grow your stake
- ▲ ROE 44% — high return on equity
- ▲ Net margin rose: 21.2% → 32.8%
- ▲ Debt / equity 0.14 — moderate debt
- ▲ Free cash flow positive every year
🟡 Growth- ▲ Revenue grows 17.2% per year (5 y)
- ▲ Earnings per share grows 29.8% per year (5 y)
- ▼ Analysts cut the earnings forecast by -4.2% in 90 days
🔴 Trend- ▼ Over 6 mo weaker than its sector (XLC) by 13%
- ▼ Price below SMA200 — long-term downtrend
- ▼ SMA50 below SMA200 — trend down
- ▼ Over a year -1% vs S&P 500 +11% — weaker than the market
🔴 Risk · context, does not vote- ▼ Volatility 34% per year — much higher than the market (13%)
🟢 Sentiment- ▲ Consensus of 52 analysts — buy
- ▲ Mean analyst target +45% from the current price
🔴 Market · context, does not vote- ▲ S&P 500 above SMA200 — the market is in an uptrend
- ▼ Sector (XLC) below SMA200 — in a downtrend
- ▼ Sector (XLC) over 3 mo is weaker than the market by 8%
The PWA verdict uses less data than the full version: without the history of multiples and peers, F-score, Altman, interest coverage, dividend streak and expected earnings move.