More arguments against
A summary of rules, not a profit forecast — don’t buy just because of a green verdict.
🟡 Valuation- ▲ Forward P/E 11.9 is below the current one — earnings growth expected
🔴 Quality- ▼ Share count up 7% in 3 y — your stake is being diluted
- ▼ Pays out more in dividends than it earns (payout 121%)
- ▲ Net margin rose: 1.6% → 6.3%
- ▼ Debt / equity 2.14 — heavy debt load
🟡 Growth- ▼ Revenue falls -13.1% per year (3 y)
- ▲ Earnings per share grows 37.5% per year (3 y)
🔴 Trend- ▼ Price below SMA200 — long-term downtrend
- ▼ SMA50 below SMA200 — trend down
- ▼ Over a year +2% vs S&P 500 +11% — weaker than the market
🔴 Risk · context, does not vote- ▼ Earnings in 11 d — the price may move sharply
- ▼ Risk/reward 1:0.6 — the target is closer than the stop
- ▼ Volatility 23% per year — much higher than the market (13%)
- ▼ Max drawdown in the period -55% — deep
🔴 Market · context, does not vote- ▲ S&P 500 above SMA200 — the market is in an uptrend
- ▼ Sector (XLU) below SMA200 — in a downtrend
- ▼ Sector (XLU) over 3 mo is weaker than the market by 5%
The PWA verdict uses less data than the full version: without the history of multiples and peers, F-score, Altman, interest coverage, dividend streak and expected earnings move.